Forcing Pre-Election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts: Uncovering the Rigged System

The integrity of elections is paramount in a democratic society. Pre-election and exit polls are crucial tools for assessing the public's opinion and gauging the potential outcome of an election. However, in recent years, there have been growing concerns about the manipulation of these polls to match fraudulent vote counts. This article delves into this alarming trend, examining the mechanisms used to distort poll results and the devastating consequences for democracy.

The manipulation of pre-election and exit polls typically involves two primary methods:

• Poll Suppression: Suppression occurs when certain demographic groups are deliberately excluded from participating in polls. This is often achieved through targeted sampling techniques that underrepresent minority voters, young voters, or other groups perceived to be less favorable to the desired outcome.
• Poll Hacking: Poll hacking involves the unauthorized access and alteration of poll data. Hackers may inject fraudulent votes or change vote totals to manipulate the results. This can be done through phishing emails, malware attacks, or physical hacking of voting machines.

The manipulation of pre-election and exit polls has profound implications for democracy:

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-Election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts

by Richard Charnin

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2106 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Lending	:	Enabled
Print length	:	188 pages

FREE

• Undermining Public Confidence: When polls are rigged to match fraudulent vote counts, the public loses trust in the electoral process. This can lead to apathy, voter suppression, and a weakening of democratic norms.
• Distorting Election Outcomes: Manipulated polls can create a false sense of security for candidates and mislead the public about the true state of the race. This can lead to fraudulent election results and the installation of illegitimate leaders.
• Facilitating Voter Fraud: Rigged polls provide cover for voter fraud by creating a false narrative that the fraudulent vote count is consistent with public opinion. This makes it more difficult to expose and prosecute fraudulent voting practices.

Numerous cases have emerged around the world where pre-election and exit polls have been manipulated to match fraudulent vote counts. Some notable examples include:

• 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: Pre-election polls predicted a narrow victory for Al Gore, while exit polls showed a decisive lead for George W. Bush. However, the official vote count gave Bush the win in Florida by a razor-thin margin, raising suspicions of fraud.
• 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: Pre-election polls consistently showed Hillary Clinton with a significant lead over Donald Trump. However, exit polls on Election Day suggested a closer race, and ultimately Trump won the Electoral College despite losing the popular vote.
• 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election: Exit polls indicated a clear victory for Prabowo Subianto, but the official vote count declared Joko Widodo the winner by a narrow margin. Allegations of widespread fraud and poll manipulation cast doubt on the legitimacy of the result.

Combating the manipulation of pre-election and exit polls requires a multi-pronged approach:

• Transparency and Accountability: Independent oversight of polls and the release of raw data can help detect and prevent manipulation.
• Robust Cybersecurity Measures: Governments and pollsters must implement strong cybersecurity measures to protect against poll hacking and data breaches.
• Civic Education and Awareness: Educating the public about the risks of poll manipulation and encouraging voter participation can help mitigate the impact of suppression and fraud.
• Electoral Reform: Consider implementing ranked-choice voting systems and automatic voter registration to reduce the opportunities for manipulation.
• International Cooperation: Joint efforts among international organizations and governments can help combat cross-bFree Download poll manipulation and promote electoral integrity.

The manipulation of pre-election and exit polls is a grave threat to democracy. It undermines public confidence, distorts election outcomes, and facilitates voter fraud. To protect the integrity of our electoral systems, we must address this alarming trend through transparency, accountability, and robust safeguards. Only by ensuring that polls accurately reflect the will of the people can we maintain a truly democratic society.

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-Election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts

by Richard Charnin

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2106 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Lending	:	Enabled
Print length	:	188 pages

FREE